
Comprehensive Resource Library for Leading PreK-12 Education Systems Change - Principles
- Samantha Holquist
- Mara Schanfield
- Ben Cronkright
- Cassidy Guros
- Rebecca M. Jones
- Alyssa Scott
- Ja’Chelle Ball
- Joselyn Angeles-Figueroa
- Olivia Reyes
- Jennifer Widstrand
Guiding Principles for PreK-12 Education Systems Change
Child Trends’ Guiding Principles for PreK-12 Education Systems Change provide decision makers with a comprehensive framework for leading effective, sustainable improvements across schools, districts, and state education systems. These principles emphasize that all change efforts should be guided by a holistic, collaborative approach where strategies are aligned and continuously refined.
Each principle highlights a critical element for meaningful, systemwide transformation:
- Systemic improvement: Change should occur across all levels of the system, from classrooms to state agencies, ensuring that efforts are not isolated but are instead coordinated for broader impact.
- Partnership engagement: Change should happen in collaboration with educators, families, students, and community partners, ensuring that multiple voices shape decisions and share responsibility for success.
- Growth mindset: Change requires a culture in which learning and adaptation are embraced and challenges are seen as opportunities for growth rather than obstacles.
- Capacity building: Decision makers must intentionally build the skills, knowledge, and resources of staff at every level to support and sustain improvement efforts.
- Data and feedback: Effective change relies on continuous cycles of data collection, reflection, and feedback to inform decisions and adjust strategies as needed.
- Goal alignment: Change should align both internal priorities and external community expectations to avoid confusion, reduce conflicting initiatives, and build collective ownership of progress.
By embedding these principles into all stages of the change process—planning, implementation, and evaluation—decision makers can create cohesive strategies that promote shared accountability, effective collaboration, and sustainable student outcomes. This guiding framework ensures that improvement efforts remain both focused and adaptable, positioning education leaders for long-term success and school systems in which all students can thrive.
Emphasize systemic improvement.
Improvement efforts are most effective when they occur across multiple levels of the education system rather than within a silo. Sustainable, meaningful change requires strategies—such as vision-setting, need sensing, and evaluative reflection—that operate systemwide, from classrooms to state agencies. System leaders can foster cohesion by grounding these strategies in empirical evidence, professional expertise, and historical knowledge while ensuring alignment across policies, practices, and goals. This coordinated approach moves the system beyond isolated adjustments, driving collective progress and reinforcing shared accountability for student success.
Systemic improvement requires intentional collaboration among state and local education agencies (SEAs and LEAs) and schools, with each playing a distinct yet interconnected role. SEAs can set a shared vision for improvement, establish policies that promote change, and provide resources and technical assistance to support district- and school-level implementation. Districts play a critical role in aligning strategies with local needs, facilitating professional learning, and ensuring that schools have the capacity to implement changes effectively. Schools, as the core setting for student learning, put these strategies into daily practice, using data and feedback loops to continuously refine instruction. When all levels work together in a coordinated way—sharing data, aligning strategies, and adapting based on feedback—the system becomes more cohesive and capable of driving lasting, positive change for all students.
Key considerations for leading improvement across an education system:
- Expand beyond individual efforts: While improvement may start with individual actions, lasting change requires strategies that intentionally scale across the system.
- Adapt strategies to local needs: SEAs and LEAs can better support schools when they refine their programs and supports based on the needs of the schools they serve, rather than applying uniform solutions.
- Enhance system-wide communication: Effective system-wide improvement requires ongoing reflection on how changes are communicated, planned, implemented, and evaluated across all levels of the system.
By taking a coordinated, multi-level approach to improvement, education decision makers can create the conditions for sustainable, system-wide progress that benefits all students.
Strengthen partnership engagement.
True transformation in education requires a collaborative approach in which all partners work together toward shared goals. Effective partnerships are essential for driving and sustaining meaningful change, including among administrators, educators, families, students, community members, community-based organizations, agency personnel, and technical assistance providers.
Strong partnerships are built through collaborative spaces grounded in trust, adequate time, and effective protocols. These spaces allow partners to come together, share ideas, and co-create solutions that reflect the community’s multiple needs. Clear and consistent communication plays a crucial role in building trust and ensuring the smooth flow of information, helping educational agencies harness the collective wisdom of all partners to make informed, innovative decisions.
Key considerations for strengthening partnerships:
- Multi-directional information flow: Go beyond sharing new policies and guidelines. Develop regular feedback channels to better understand and respond to local needs.
- Two-way communication: Encourage open dialogue in which leadership actively listens to multiple perspectives before making decisions. When partners see their input reflected in decisions, they may be less resistant to new initiatives and more likely to embrace long-term collaboration.
By prioritizing trust, collaboration, and open communication, educational agencies can build stronger partnerships that support lasting, positive change.
Focus on building a collective growth mindset.
A growth mindset transforms an education system into a dynamic learning environment where challenges are embraced, effort is celebrated, and continuous improvement becomes the norm. In education systems that promote growth mindsets, decision makers, educators, and students feel psychologically safe, value the learning process, and remain resilient to setbacks. This mindset shifts the focus from outcomes to growth, emphasizing that intelligence and skills can be developed through effort and persistence.
Fostering a growth mindset across an education system requires challenging assumptions and embracing continuous learning at all levels. While a fixed mindset views challenges with the fear of failure, a growth mindset sees them as opportunities to learn and excel. This mindset begins with individual awareness and, when embraced collectively, can transform organizational culture, encouraging collaboration, risk-taking, and shared learning.
Key considerations for promoting a growth mindset:
- Cultural shift: Encouraging a growth mindset can create a culture of openness, adaptability, and continuous innovation.
- Collective impact: When teams value collective impact, they are more likely to take risks, support one another, and learn from mistakes, leading to meaningful progress.
Embracing a growth mindset across an education system fosters resilience, collaboration, and continuous learning, creating a culture where challenges are seen as opportunities for growth and lasting improvement.
Build capacities for systemic intervention.
Capacity building involves developing the skills, knowledge, and tools that individuals and groups need to effectively drive and sustain improvement. Successful systemic intervention depends on equipping teams with these competencies while creating the conditions for continuous improvement. School systems should build a strong infrastructure with physical, relational, and procedural supports that enable collaboration and efficiency. When teams have both the right resources and supportive conditions, they are more likely to adopt evidence-based practices and maintain long-term progress.
Effective systemic improvement requires more than individual leadership—it depends on collaboration across all levels of the education system, from SEAs to schools. However, many educators and school administrators receive limited training on how to lead system-wide change, as most preparation focuses on individual or site-level leadership. This gap reinforces the need for capacity-building as a continuous process, emphasizing ongoing learning, collaboration, and shared leadership across roles and levels.
A critical aspect of systemic intervention is forming implementation teams that are prepared to support and sustain change at multiple levels. These teams—which may include administrators, educators, and community partners—ensure support for efforts at every stage of implementation. In complex initiatives, such as a statewide rollout of a new assessment system, linked teams at the state, regional, district, and school levels help monitor progress and maintain alignment.
Key considerations for building capacity:
- Readiness for change: Introducing new partners or practices can disrupt established systems. Identifying and addressing unforeseen challenges early, alongside those who are most affected, can prevent setbacks.
- Sustainable infrastructure: Capacity building requires both general capacity (i.e., the ability to execute work) and specific capacity (i.e., the skills needed for successful implementation).
School improvement experts Michael Fullan and Joanne Quinn emphasize that “Structure and strategy are not enough. The solution requires the individual and collective ability to build shared meaning, capacity, and commitment to action.” By prioritizing continuous capacity building, education systems can create the foundation for lasting, meaningful improvement.
Utilize data and feedback.
Data and feedback are essential for driving improvement; they ensure that change efforts are informed by real-time information and evolving needs. Establishing systems to consistently collect, analyze, and act on data allows education systems to make informed decisions, adapt to new insights, and respond effectively to challenges. Actively seeking feedback from stakeholders (e.g., administrators, educators, students, families, and community partners) creates opportunities for a variety of voices to contribute meaningfully and strengthens trust through responsiveness.
Feedback loops, both within and across levels of education systems, ensure that data are practically useful by facilitating continuous reflection, evaluation, and adjustment. These loops should balance data accuracy with context, as data without interpretation often holds limited value. Maintaining a cycle of data collection, analysis, and reporting supports ongoing monitoring of progress, decision making, and outcome evaluation. Feedback loops function as iterative processes to ensure continuous improvement at each level of the system while connecting insights across all levels.
Teams with valid and reliable data on how a program or policy is functioning can better guide decision-making and adjust strategies as needed. However, effective data use also requires a culture of transparency and distributed leadership where feedback is both valued and acted upon. Clearly communicating how feedback will be used—and explaining when it cannot be—builds trust and reinforces the importance of collaboration in the improvement process.
Key considerations for using data and feedback effectively:
- Transparency matters: Communicate how data will be used from the start and show how data informed decisions. If data cannot be acted upon, explain what constraints prevent this.
- System alignment: Without effective feedback loops, new innovations are often adjusted to fit existing structures instead of systems evolving to support effective innovations.
By prioritizing data-informed decision making and feedback processes, education systems can create a culture of continuous learning and sustained improvement.
Align internal goals with external expectations.
Effective systemic change requires alignment between a system’s internal goals and the expectations of the community it serves. Education systems often implement multiple programs and initiatives simultaneously; without sufficient coordination, these efforts can lead to resource competition, confusion, and reduced sustainability. However, deliberately aligning goals with external expectations expands access to financial, organizational, and human resources while creating clarity and consistency for all partners.
Closing the gap between internal priorities and external demands requires transparent communication and a willingness to acknowledge uncertainties. Sharing both what is known and what remains uncertain can build trust, strengthen partner engagement, and help communities understand how improvement efforts address their unique interests. This transparency fosters shared ownership and creates a supportive environment for collaboration, innovation, and long-term success.
Key considerations for aligning goals and expectations:
- Consistent alignment matters: Ensuring congruence between internal goals and community expectations helps manage partner trust, reduce confusion, and improve service delivery.
- Target partner needs: Design implementation plans that address both practical concerns and emotional factors, allowing decision makers to meet internal needs while clearly communicating a coherent vision to external partners.
Aligning internal goals with community expectations through transparent communication and collaboration ensures clarity, trust, and long-term success in systemic improvement efforts.