We were transparent from the beginning of the project that our dissemination would need to include five individual profiles, a summary report, and a webinar. When it came time to share our findings, we offered research group members the opportunity to review and edit both their profile and the summary report. The group also decided they wanted to design the webinar and take on most of the speaking roles. This page shares some information about the review process, the webinar planning process, and our reflections to close out the project.
Profile review process
Because our goal was to learn from how each individual organization in the research group authentically engaged young people in the policy process, we created individual profiles highlighting our findings as it related to youth roles, the policy process, organizational practices, local factors, and outcomes.
Child Trends staff drafted these profiles based on the results of the individual meaning making meetings, and also wanted to make sure everyone had a chance to review the profiles. It felt important to provide multiple opportunities for research group members to engage in this review process. The first option was to review the document we attached to an email and provide written feedback on their own time. The second option was to attend a drop-in meeting where we discussed the profile and their feedback together in real-time.
Downloadable Resource
- YEP Meeting 11 - Drop In Profile Review Facilitation Guide – This is the facilitation guide we used for the drop-in meetings to have research group members review their profiles.
Webinar planning process
The majority of the time we spent on sharing findings as a research group was in planning our webinar. While a webinar was selected at the project proposal stage, we did not prescribe the format or participants. We identified a few potential approaches to the planning process: working with a small group of interested research group members to plan and implement the webinar or involving the entire research group. We started our planning process with an activity asking research group members to brainstorm content for the webinar. Through that activity and the subsequent meeting focused on structure, it became obvious that the entire research group wanted to be part of the planning and implementation of the webinar. We ended up dedicating three full meetings, half of another meeting, plus a run-through to prepare for the webinar. The details of each of these meetings are below.
Session 1: initial brainstorming
In this session, we dedicated half of the time to an initial brainstorm of webinar content and structure. This helped us plan for the next meeting fully dedicated to webinar planning.
Downloadable Resources
- YEP Meeting 12 - Full Group Facilitation Guide – This facilitation guide includes the initial brainstorming activity.
- YEP Meeting 12 - Full Group Slides – The accompanying slides for this meeting.
Session 2: webinar agenda
In this session, we focused on creating a webinar agenda by dividing into two small groups to plan their ideal 60-minute webinar. Then we came together as a large group to blend the two agendas and reach a consensus about how we would spend the hour. We also discussed how we wanted to proceed with webinar planning, as a full group or a smaller subgroup. The decision was to move forward with planning as a full group.
Downloadable Resources
- YEP Meeting 13 - Full Group Facilitation Guide – This facilitation guide includes information about how we led this webinar planning meeting.
- YEP Meeting 13 - Full Group Slides – The accompanying slides for this meeting.
Session 3: panel questions and speaking roles
In this session, we had two goals. In the previous meeting, the research group decided part of the webinar should include a panel discussion, so we spent time gathering their ideas for questions the panelists could address to related to youth roles, the policy process, organizational practices, and outcomes. The second goal was to start identifying which research group members were interested in presenting or speaking during each of section of the webinar. After this meeting, Child Trends staff drafted a proposal of panel questions and speaking roles, which we shared with the research group for feedback and/or approval.
Downloadable Resources
- YEP Meeting 14 - Full Group Facilitation Guide – This facilitation guide includes information about how we led this webinar planning meeting.
- YEP Meeting 14 - Full Group Slides – The accompanying slides for this meeting.
Session 4: small group prep sessions
Once research group members reviewed and approved the proposal for panel questions and roles, we were able to move forward with helping each of them prepare for their role! We held meetings with smaller groups to have more focused support. All in all, we hosted four prep meetings. One meeting was with three organizational staff research group members who were preparing their two-minute overviews on their organizational and policy wins. A second meeting included two of the four youth research group member panelists, while a third meeting supported a third youth panelist. The final meeting was with a staff and youth research group member from the same grantee organization. These sessions provided valuable time for research group members to take notes, brainstorm ideas, and begin practicing both in the session and on their own afterwards.
Downloadable Resource
- YEP Meeting 15 - Small Group Webinar Prep – This facilitation guide includes information about how we led the small group prep sessions.
Session 5: webinar run-through
Our final meeting of the webinar planning process was to schedule a run-through a few days before the actual webinar. We went through all the slides and had everyone practice speaking their role. This helped answer any questions research group members had in real-time, troubleshoot some technology issues, and make sure we were as prepared as possible for the webinar.
Reflections
After the webinar, we held a final meeting with the research group to reflect on our work together as the project ended. In this meeting, we celebrated the completion of our webinar and shared kudos with the research group. We also asked for their reflections on what went well, what was challenging, and what we could be improved in future projects
Next, we moved into broader reflections. We shared a timeline of all the research activities and work we completed together then asked them to share what they learned from this project, about both youth engagement and research. Child Trends staff also wanted to know more about their experience in the research group, so we asked a few questions to encourage their reflections.
Although we planned to do an activity that encouraged research group members to think about the future and what we hoped this project would help accomplish in their communities and across the country, we ran out of time. Instead, we felt it was more important to share information about how research group members could talk about this work on their resumes and highlight all the publications their names were included on. Child Trends staff shared a resume template with this information to all research group members.
Downloadable Resources
- YEP Meeting 16 - Full Group Facilitation Guide – This facilitation guide includes information about our final reflection meeting.
- YEP Meeting 16 - Full Group Slides – The accompanying slides for this meeting.
- YEP Resume Template – This document was shared with all research group members as an example of how they could include their work on this project in a resume.
The Youth Engagement in Policy Research Group brought together young leaders and practitioners from across the country: Jamya Clark and Faith Robinson (New Orleans Youth Alliance); Teddy DeLeon-Alvarado, Blandina Flores, and Sam Joo (Para Los Niños); Iziko Calderon and Brisia Gutierrez (Los Angeles Opportunity Youth Collaborative); Nadirra Monrose and Tony Turner (Center for Fair Futures); and Deven Rudy-Johnson, MSW, and Kyra Stoute (Georgia EmpowerMEnt). Child Trends staff included principal investigators Amy McKlindon and Samantha Holquist; researchers Alyssa Scott, Ja’Chelle Ball, Jessica Conway, and Sage Caballero; and senior advisors Karin Malm and Elizabeth Jordan (Child Trends) and Julie Petrokubi (Education Northwest).
If you have questions about the Authentic Youth Engagement in Policy Project, please contact co-Principal Investigators Amy McKlindon at amcklindon@childtrends.org and Samantha E. Holquist at sholquist@childtrends.org.
This study is supported by the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation through its Foster Youth and Opportunity Youth Initiatives.