a group of men in a support group sit together

Implementation and Impact Evaluation of Social Resilience Model in the PREPARE Program in New York City

To better understand the needs of fathers and father figures returning from incarceration, Child Trends partnered with the Osborne Association to evaluate the impact and implementation of integrating Social Resilience Model (SRM) skills into the Osborne Association’s Pathways to Reentry, Employment, and Parenting (PREPARE) program. The key goals of the evaluation were to identify whether—and how—PREPARE and PREPARE Plus (the PREPARE program plus the addition of the SRM skills) impact the lives of formerly incarcerated fathers in four areas: 1) parenting, 2) healthy relationships, 3) employment readiness and financial education, and 4) reduced recidivism.

Context

Fathers returning from incarceration often face steep challenges to rebuilding healthy family relationships, securing stable employment, and navigating persistent stigma. As returning citizens, they also face:

About PREPARE and PREPARE Plus

The Osborne Association’s PREPARE program, grounded in more than 35 years of experience working with justice-impacted families, offers a holistic response to reentry. Designed to mitigate barriers to reentry and promote long-term success, PREPARE supports fathers in reentry, employment, and parenting by helping justice-involved fathers and their families build skills that promote stability, strong relationships, and successful reentry.

Designed for fathers with low incomes who have been impacted by incarceration, detention, probation, or parole, PREPARE offers a three-week core curriculum focused on parenting education, healthy relationship skills, job placement services, and workforce readiness. Participants engage with evidence-based content—such as 24/7 Dad and Ready, Set, Work!—to strengthen parenting practices, improve economic outcomes, and navigate co-parenting relationships. The program also connects families with referrals, child support and financial literacy workshops and supports, and industry-recognized credential training hard skills training (e.g., OSHA, Site and Safety Credentialing) to enhance well-being and long-term engagement. Through culturally responsive and father-centered approaches, PREPARE aims to foster safer communities and healthier family dynamics during fathers’ transition home.

PREPARE Plus enhances the core PREPARE program by introducing fathers to the Social Resilience Model, or SRM. SRM uses neuroscience-based attention management skills to manage stress and trauma and build resilience. Over the course of three weeks, participants are provided educational practices that deepen resilience and promote attention management and self-regulation, while decreasing responsiveness to traumatic triggers. PREPARE Plus participants are provided opportunities to practice SRM skills in class using instructional videos that explain the skills; class facilitators also use Dan Siegel’s “Hand Model of the Brain” to demonstrate the impact of stress and triggers on the brain.


Figure. SRM Skills

Icon representing text. Tracking (sensory tracking): By paying attention to internal bodily sensations (e.g., breath, heart rate, muscle tension), participants notice signs of stress or calm. This builds their awareness of how reactivity arises and lays the foundation for all other SRM skills. Icon representing text. Resourcing and resource strengthening: Participants are taught to think of a person, place, memory, or object that evokes a sense of comfort, safety, or joy. They deepen these “resources” by focusing on sensory details, which helps shift attention away from distress and toward calm. Icon representing text. Grounding: By focusing attention on the sensation of contact with solid surfaces (e.g., feet on the floor, back against a chair), grounding creates stability in the nervous system, promotes calming practices, and interrupts reactivity. Icon representing text. Shift and stay: This skill involves intentionally shifting one’s attention away from distressing stimuli toward a calming sensation, then maintaining focus in that place of calm. This technique is useful in managing pain, overwhelming emotions, and disruptive thoughts.

About Our Evaluation

Evaluation design

Child Trends conducted a rigorous impact and implementation evaluation of the Osborne Association’s PREPARE and PREPARE Plus programs using a randomized control trial to assess how these programs influence outcomes for justice-involved fathers. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to either PREPARE or PREPARE Plus and the evaluation used surveys to measure their outcomes at program entry, exit, and three months post-completion. The impact evaluation focused on the outcomes of fathers’ perspectives, decisions, behaviors, and knowledge across four key areas (i.e., parenting, healthy relationships, financial stability, and reduced recidivism), with an eye toward understanding what meaningful change looks like for participants.

The implementation evaluation focused on the integration of SRM practices and content into the PREPARE program and on participant outcomes involving SRM uptake. The research team adapted the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to develop study protocols. We collected implementation data through virtual observations, staff interviews conducted once a year, focus groups conducted at the program exit, and follow-up interviews three months post completion.


Table. Data Collection Procedures

Table. Data Collection Procedures

Strategies for authentic stakeholder partnership

When our research team designed the evaluation, we kept in mind both the study’s population and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. To ensure that our study reflected the voices and experiences of reentering fathers and father figures, we engaged them as experts in the study design. This evaluation started in 2020, around the same time as the pandemic. As a result, the program—which had previously been delivered in-person at two sites in the Bronx and Brooklyn—moved to virtual delivery. Implementation data collection was most impacted by COVID-19, as all data collection was moved to be virtual. Finally, we utilized data shares to provide updates on data collection with our partner, the Osborne Association. Below is a list of strategies we used to authentically engage our partner:

  • We conducted cognitive interviews with former program participants to ensure that we asked the correct questions in surveys, exit focus groups, and follow-up interviews.
  • We also collaborated with Osborne Association staff to review the CFIR implementation framework and identify relevant components.
  • Over the course of four years of data collection, we shared data to engage with our partner, keep them up to date with the project, share early findings, and improve implementation. We planned for two data share opportunities: first, halfway through the study to share what we were learning and seeing; and second, at the end of the study to engage the partner and program facilitators to interpret our findings.
  • Finally, we co-presented with Osborne Association staff at the 2024 National Fatherhood Summit to share early findings.

Learnings

Previous Osborne Evaluations

Funder

This study was funded by the Office of Family Assistance within the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). Grant Number 90ZJ0022-01-00.

Acknowledgements

Osborne Association team members

We wish to express our heartfelt thanks to current and former staff at The Osborne Association for their tireless efforts in supporting program implementation and providing critical insights throughout the evaluation process. We are especially grateful to Michelle Portlock, Steuben Vega, Sharon Livingston, Petal Fogenay-Foster, Gyasi Hedden, Jenny Santiago, Dwight Stephenson, Darryl Ojeda, and Steve Nesselroth. Your commitment to serving returning citizens and fostering positive change laid the foundation for this work. Special appreciation is extended to Laurie Leitch, creator of the Social Resilience Model, whose thoughtful insights were instrumental to the success of both the program and evaluation teams.

Child Trends team members

Over the past five years, many Child Trends team members have contributed to the evaluation.

Victor St. John, principal investigator

Fadumo M. Abdi, project director

Hannah Rackers

Emma Pliskin

Opiaah A. Jeffers

Tyler Chandler

Lisa Kim

Sunny Sun

Catherine Schaefer

Abigail Wulah

Mindy E. Scott

Elizabeth Karberg

Zabryna Balén

Elizabeth Cook