Educationally Disadvantaged Older Youth: Arrest rate, Long-term


On another measure of antisocial behavior-arrest rates-programs, especially those with an employment focus, were found to be effective, at least in the short term. Participants in Youth Corps were less likely to have been arrested than youths in the control group by the end of the program. Similarly, participants in Job Corps and JOBSTART had fewer arrests in the year following the program (JC1, JS2). Only two programs-the Nurse Home Visitation Program and Job Corps-lowered arrest rates among participants in the long term (NHV2, JC2). In addition, children of participants in the Nurse Home Visitation Program had fewer arrests than children of youths in the control group.

Several programs found no difference in long-term arrest rates, while in one case, participants' arrest rates increased. For example, participants in JTPA did not have significantly different arrest rates 21 and 36 months after having been assigned randomly to the program; furthermore, young men without an arrest record at the time of assignment experienced an almost 11 percentage point increase in arrests (JTPA). Similarly, JOBSTART ceased to make a difference in arrest rates by the time long-term follow-up studies were conducted (JS2). Job Corps was the only program that reduced arrest rates in both the short term (one year after beginning the program) and the long term (48 months after the program ended) (JC1, JC2).


 
See Page 30-31 in Full Report

<< Back to Table   |  Full Report (.pdf) | Executive Summary
- View Program References & Acronyms -