Back to
City Scan
Home Page

City Scan:
Woodrock Youth Development Project
Back to
 
Approach
Out of School/ Summer Mentoring Tutoring Counseling/ Therapy School-based Clinic/ Provider-based Service/
Vocational learning
Parent or family component Other
x x

 

Outcomes
Educational/ Cognitive Social/ Emotional Life Skills Physical Health Behavior Problems Reproductive Citizenship Mental Health
x x x x x  

 

Background Information Program size

Age range

Research Program Fee?
Contact information:
1229 Chestnut Street
Suite M7
Philadelphia, PA 19107

 

Website: www.woodrock.org
 

Mission/Goals: The Woodrock mission is to promote interracial, interethnic, and intercultural harmony among youth.

Sources: www.woodrock.org; www.childtrends.org/Lifecourse/programs/

WoodrockYouthDevelopment.htm

Notes: Woodrock has developed a comprehensive life skills curriculum that has been adopted by schools, after-school programs, and summer camps in the Philadelphia area. The Youth Development Project (YDP) combines three prevention strategies to reduce and/or maintain low levels of alcohol, tobacco, and drug use. These strategies strive to improve family, school, and community supports that are available to youth; to help youth develop general living and interpersonal skills; and to train youth in drug resistance skills and knowledge.

Approximately 3,000 Elementary and middle school students (ages 6-14) Please click here for more information on this evaluation.

 

Type of Evaluation: Experimental

 

Objective: To examine the impact of the Woodrock YDP on youth substance abuse and other outcomes.

Impact/Outcome Findings: Evaluators measured a positive impact on participants in four of seven outcome measures, and positive but not statistically significant influences on two other measures. The differences between the posttest scores were statistically significant for drug use during the lifetime, drug use in the last month, race-relations and ethnocentrism, and self-reported school attendance. Though failing to reach statistical significance, findings revealed higher prosocial scores for the experimental group on the  measures of self-esteem and aggression. The control group reported slightly more prosocial attitudes toward ATD use than did the experimental group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Also available in What Works: LINKS

Not available
   

 To return to previous page click here

© Child Trends 2004