THE BUDDY SYSTEM

OVERVIEW

The Buddy System was a mentoring program designed to improve participants' academic and social behaviors, and to promote interaction between youth and older role models. The program was based on individual and group mentoring, and on encouraging positive behaviors through financial incentives. Evaluations of the program found that participants who had committed major offenses prior to enrollment in the program were less likely to commit such offenses during or after having participated in the program. Buddy System participants who had never committed major offenses before entering the program, however, were significantly more likely to do so than were youth in the control group.

DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM 

Target Population: Multi-ethnic children, teens and youth (10 to 17) with academic or behavioral problems 

The Buddy System is a mentoring program designed to improve participants' academic and social behaviors, and to promote interaction between youth and older role models. The program provides a mentor from the community to multi-ethnic older children, teens and youth children who have been referred to The Buddy System by schools, police, courts, social welfare agencies, or community residents because of academic or behavioral problems. Occasionally, mentors and participants engage in group mentoring with other Buddy System mentoring pairs. Finally, The Buddy System has a monthly financial incentive component, which is designed to reward participants if their behaviors were rated as having improved. The program is designed to provide safe and secure relationships, impart social skills, encourage participants to engage in socially appropriate behaviors, and improve academic performance. 

Component

Provided by

Duration

Description

One-on-one Mentoring

CommunityResident

Less than 1 year for most participants Weekly meetings engaging in social activities; mentors trained to establish a warm trusting relationship and to create a plan to change targeted behaviors

 

Group mentoring

Community resident

 

When appropriate, mentors met with their mentees in group activities

Financial incentive

Program

 

Youth were given $10/month if their behaviors improved


EVALUATION(S) OF PROGRAM 

STUDY 1: Fo, W. S., & O'Donnell, C. R. (1975). The Buddy System: Effects of community intervention on delinquent offenses. Behavior Therapy, 6, 522-524. 

Evaluated population: Youth referred to program, treatment n=264 and control group n=178. 

Objective: 
To determine the effects of the program on delinquent acts.
Measurement instrument:
Records on the delinquent offenses of participants and control group.
Evaluation:
Type: Experimental, random assignment, treatment n=264 and control group n=178. Statistical techniques: Z test, Significance Level=.05
Outcome:
For youth who had committed major offenses in the year prior to entering the project, program youth were significantly less likely to have committed major offenses during the Buddy System year (37.5%) than were the youth in the control group (64%). The pattern was opposite, however, for youths with no record of major offenses in the preceding year; in this case, program youth were significantly more likely to have committed major offenses (15.7%) than the control youth (7.2%).
Other Information:
Funding provided through HUD's model cities and HEW's office of Junvenile Delinquency and Youth Development. 

STUDY 2: O'Donnell, C. R., Lydgate, T., & Fo, W. S. (1979). The Buddy System: Review and follow-up. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 161-169. 

Evaluated population: 335 youths (206 boys and 129 girls) in the experimental group. 218 youths (151 boys and 67 girls) in the control group. In the experimental group 255 were in the program for one year, 73 for two years and 7 for three years. In the control group 195 were assigned to one year, 23 for two years and none for three years. 

Objective: 
To evaluate the effectiveness of the program based on the arrest data (for major offenses only) of participants over a three-year span.
Measurement instrument:
Arrest records of participants and control group one year before participation, the year(s) of participation and two years after the initial year of participation.
Evaluation:
Type: Experimental
Statistical techniques: Two tailed Z Tests, Significance Level=.05
Outcome:
The Buddy system was most effective for youth who had been arrested for major offenses in year preceding participation in the program: 56% of these participants vs 78% of the control group (p<.04) were arrested for a major offense in the program year or 2 years after. Of participants without prior arrests, those in the treatment group were more likely to commit a major offense than those in the control group: 22.5% vs 16.4% (p<.05). 

SOURCES FOR MORE INFORMATION 

References: 

Fo, W. S., & O'Donnell, C. R. (1975). The Buddy System: Effects of community intervention on delinquent offenses. Behavior Therapy, 6, 522-524. 

O'Donnell, C. R., Lydgate, T., & Fo, W. S. (1979). The Buddy System: Review and follow-up. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 161-169. 

Program also discussed in the following Child Trends publication(s): 

Jekielek, S., Moore, K. A., & Hair, E. (2002). Mentoring programs and youth development: A synthesis. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

SUMMARY & CATEGORIZATION

Program categorized in this guide according to the following:

Evaluated participant ages: 10-17 / Program age ranges in the Guide: 6-11, 12-14, 15-21

Program components: Mentoring/tutoring, Clinic/provider-based

Measured outcomes: Behavioral problems

 

KEYWORDS: Mentoring, Education, Social/Emotional Health and Development, Juvenile Offenders, Children, Youth, B4ehavorial Problems, Delinquency, Tutoring, Clinic-Based, Provider Based, Middle Childhood (6-11), Adolescence (12-17), co-ed.

 

Program information last updated 2/7/02.

 

 

 

 

© Child Trends 2003