|
Guide
to Effective Programs
for Children and Youth |
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS (BBBS): COMMUNITY-BASED MENTORING
OVERVIEW
Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) is an intensive, community-based mentoring program for at-risk school-aged children and adolescents. BBBS staff carefully screen and match community volunteers with participants and then monitor and provide ongoing support to the matches. BBBS mentoring is designed to promote emotional support, positive social skills, feelings of safety and security, academic skills, and more positive relationships with family and peers. An experimental evaluation of the community-based BBBS program found statistically significant impacts on drug abuse initiation, hitting someone, scholastic competence, skipping class, skipping school, parental relationship, family trust, and lying to a parent; subgroup analyses also found impacts on some outcomes by race and/or gender.
DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM
Target participant: At-risk school-age children and adolescents.
Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) is an intensive, community-based mentoring
program targeting at-risk five- to 18-year-old children and adolescents who
desire a match with a Big Brother or Big Sister. Mentors (or “Bigs”) are
volunteers from the community who are extensively screened by program staff
before being matched with a mentee (or “Little”); mentors are expected to commit
to meet with their mentee for at least one year. Throughout the mentoring
relationship, BBBS program staff monitor the matches and provide support to
mentors. Typically, mentees and mentors meet two to four times each month, and
meetings last four hours. The mentoring relationship is designed to provide a
sense of safety and security, emotional support, social skill promotion, and
help with academic, technical, and other skills; program goals include reducing
antisocial behaviors and improving Littles’ self-confidence, academic
achievement, and relationships with parents and peers. There are currently over
500 BBBS programs throughout the U.S. Estimated costs
are approximately $1,000 per match for support and supervision of each match.
A separate, school-based mentoring program has also been developed by Big Brothers Big Sisters. A write-up of the description of the school-based mentoring program, along with evaluation findings, is found on the LINKS’ database.
EVALUATION(S)
OF PROGRAM
Grossman, J.B., Tierney, J.P.
(1998). Does Mentoring Work?: An Impact Study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters
Program. Evaluation Review; 22:403-426.
Tierney, J.P., Grossman, J.B.
& Resch, N.L. (1995). Making a difference: An impact study of Big Brothers Big
Sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Evaluated population: A total of 959 adolescents 10-16 years of
age who applied to BBBS programs in 1992 and 1993 at eight local agencies
comprised the study sample. Approximately eight-in-ten participants (79%) were
between 10 and 13 years of age, 62% were boys, 83% came from families with a
household income below $25,000, and more than one-in-four (27%) had experienced
at least one type of abuse such as physical, emotional, or sexual.
Approach: This program randomly assigned participants either to the
intervention group (n=487) or control group (n=472). In total, 46 outcomes were
assessed, which are presented in the following table, by outcome area. Program
impacts were measured 18 months after the start of the pairing.
|
Antisocial activities |
Academic performance, attitudes and behaviors |
Relationship with family |
Relationship with friends |
Self-concept |
Social and cultural enrichment |
|
Drug abuse initiation |
Scholastic competence |
Parental relationship |
Intimacy in communication |
Global self-worth |
Social and cultural activities |
|
Alcohol use initiation |
GPA |
Trust |
Instrumental support |
Social acceptance |
Social and cultural events |
|
Hit someone |
Skipped class |
Communication |
Emotional support |
Self-confidence |
Sports or recreation |
|
Stealing |
Skipped school |
Anger and alienation |
Conflict |
|
Volunteering or community service |
|
Property damaged |
Weekly hours spent on homework |
Lied to parent |
|
|
Art, dance, or music lessons |
|
Behavioral conduct |
Weekly hours spent reading |
|
|
|
Attended play |
|
Fighting |
School value |
|
|
|
Attended dance performance |
|
Risky behaviors |
College visits |
|
|
|
Attended music concert |
|
Principal’s office visit |
Books read |
|
|
|
School clubs or organizations |
|
Test cheating |
Library trips |
|
|
|
Youth groups |
|
Smoking |
|
|
|
|
Attend sporting event |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outdoor activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visited museums |
Results: At the 18-month follow-up period, there were significant impacts on drug abuse initiation, hitting someone, scholastic competence, number of times skipped class, number of times skipped school, parental relationship, family trust, and number of times participant lied to a parent. There were marginal impacts on likelihood of alcohol use initiation, GPA, and peer emotional support. There were no impacts on the remaining outcomes assessed.
Additionally, there were some significant impacts by race and/or gender. In particular, there were significant impacts for both minority and white girls among the following outcomes: scholastic competence, number of times skipped class, number of times skipped school, and GPA; there was a significant impact on behavioral conduct among minority girls.
There were significant impacts
among males, particularly minority males, on initiating drug abuse and number of
times attended a sporting event. Other significant impacts were found among
males, particularly white males, including: parental relationship, family trust,
family communication, attending social and cultural events, and number of times
participating in outdoor activities.
SOURCES FOR MORE INFORMATION
For more information, please visit: http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/infohouse/publications.html#BP002
For more information about the Big Brothers Big Sisters of America program, please visit: www.bbbsa.org
References:
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and
effects of duration in students mentoring relationships. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 30(2), 199-219.
Grossman, J.B., Tierney, J.P. (1998). Does Mentoring Work?: An Impact Study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program. Evaluation Review; 22:403-426.
Tierney, J.P., Grossman, J.B. & Resch, N.L. (1995). Making
a difference: An impact study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia:
Public/Private Ventures.
KEYWORDS: Children (3-11), Adolescents (12-17), Youth (16+), Mentoring,
High-Risk, Community-based, Reading, Mathematics, Academic
Motivations/Self-concept/Expectations, Academic Achievement, Alcohol Use,
Tobacco Use, Marijuana/Illicit/Prescription Drugs, Aggression/Violence/Bullying,
Delinquency, Life Skills, Self-esteem/Self-concept, White/Caucasian,
Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, Multi-racial, American Indian/Alaska
Native, Cost.
Program information last updated 8/11/11.
| © Child Trends 2003 |