To date, little attention has been given to the relationship between early childhood experiences and bullying behaviors later in life. Understanding the existing body of research on bullying in older children and youth is critically important to efforts to reduce bullying, yet the factors that contribute to a child’s engaging in bullying behaviors are likely experienced earlier in life. In fact, studies show that the spontaneous demonstration of bullying behavior among school-aged children is highly unlikely (Nagin & Tremblay, 1999; Broidy, Nagin, Tremblay, Bates, Brame, Dodge, Ferguson, et al., 2003), and the precursors of bullying behavior can be seen already in early childhood (Perren & Alsaker, 2006; Vlachou, Andreou, Botsoglou, & Didaskalou, 2011). We may be missing an important opportunity to identify and address the antecedents of bullying before these behaviors become organized and intentional (Fraser, Lee, Kupper, & Day, 2010; Storey & Slaby, 2013; Tremblay, et al., 2010).
This brief first provides a summary of the developmental trajectory to bullying behavior and theories about social and environmental contributors to bullying. The remainder summarizes promising strategies and evidence-based intervention models designed to prevent bullying by addressing factors that contribute to the development of “mean” behavior and aggression in early childhood.
Among school-aged children, bullying is characterized by: (1) aggressive behavior (2) that is repeated, or has the potential to be repeated, and (3) that reflects an imbalance of power between the aggressor and the victim (Gladden et al., 2013). Existing research articulates that a young child’s aggressive behaviors become more organized into bullying-like behavior during the preschool years. These behaviors are similar to bullying in many ways but do not consistently adhere to the criteria used to define bullying among school-aged children. For example, bullying behavior among very young children may not be carried out consistently over time, or the dynamic between the two children or groups of children may not reflect a consistent imbalance of power (Lamb, Pepler, & Craig, 2009). Bullying behaviors in early childhood may not be as systematic, consistent, or organized as those of a school-aged child, which suggests that labeling a behavior as bullying in early childhood may be inappropriate or even inaccurate (Monks, Smith, & Swettenham, 2003).
Since the term “bullying” is specifically defined for behaviors associated with school-aged children, the development of aggression or “mean” behavior, and how it becomes organized into bullying behavior, may be a better frame for examining early warning signs among young children (Monks, Smith, & Swettenham, 2003; VanderVen, 2015).
Bullying can pose a serious threat to children’s immediate and long-term health and well-being, and can have profound impacts on all children involved in bullying behaviors, whether as the one bullying others, the one being bullied, or the one witnessing bullying. At least some of the roots of bullying behaviors, and conversely the roots of positive pro-social skills, can likely be found in adverse and positive experiences from early childhood, yet the research literature on these connections is limited. The early childhood field lacks a coherent, theoretical model that identifies the factors contributing to aggressive or “mean” behavior in young children, and establishes the developmental link between this early behavior and later bullying behavior.
Here we summarize findings from a review of the literature presented in Child Trends’s report, Bullies in the Block Area: The Early Childhood Origins of “Mean” Behavior, which finds a substantial body of evidence lending support to the following theories:
Evidence is limited and/or mixed for the connection between bullying behaviors and caregiver-child attachment, the influence of early care and education settings, the effects of early exposure to bias and prejudice, and other environmental factors such as peers or socioeconomic status. Further research is needed to understand how these factors contribute to the development of bullying behaviors from early childhood.
Future research must also continue to explore the slippery slope of the terminology used to describe “mean” behavior and aggression, being careful not to conflate typical social, emotional, and behavioral norms with signs and behaviors that suggest a child may be at risk of later bullying behavior or victimization. While researchers continue to disentangle these many considerations, this brief presents several options available to practitioners now to help them support children by promoting positive relationships and fostering desirable, or “pro-social,” behaviors and skills.
The early years present a unique opportunity to take advantage of a variety of caregiver-child relationships and social settings (at home, in preschools, child care settings, playgrounds, etc.), in which modeling, teaching, and reinforcing pro-social behaviors, empathy, and kindness can take place. Current evidence stresses the need to focus on promoting positive social and emotional skills and interactions to help prevent later bullying behaviors. There are both promising practices and evidence-based programs and resources that can help facilitate these skills in early childhood. The strategies presented here are focused on promoting protective factors and contexts for young children. A broader, more societal shift will likely be needed to address the contextual risk factors discussed in more depth in the report accompanying this brief.i
“You Can’t Say You Can’t Play”: This innovative approach devised by Vivian Gussin Paley, a former preschool and kindergarten teacher, aims to prevent exclusionary play behaviors in preschoolers by changing the attitudes of the classroom as a whole, rather than focusing on the behaviors of individual children (VanderVen, 2015). In her book You Can’t Say You Can’t Play (1993), Paley writes of the emotional struggles of excluded children, describes the origins of her idea to implement a rule in her preschool classroom that children are not allowed to exclude other children from their play activities, and reports on the positive changes she observed in the children and class dynamic. A small-scale evaluation of an intervention centered around You Can’t Say You Can’t Play (Harrist and Bradley, 2003) found mixed results (i.e., child reports from intervention classrooms were more positive than in control classrooms, but teacher reports and observations showed no significant differences). Paley’s approach has been lauded by early childhood practitioners as a successful way to promote inclusive and prosocial classroom interactions among children. Its popularity and wide usage among practitioners suggest that further evaluation of You Can’t Say You Can’t Play on larger scale would be a valuable contribution to the field.
Promoting safe and welcoming classrooms: A number of practitioner guides and resources are available to help promote supportive classroom environments that prevent bullying and engender safe, welcome settings for all children. These include:
Guidance and problem-solving: Another practitioner resource focused on promoting prosocial, positive development in young children is the “Guidance Matters” column in the journal Young Children (published on the National Association for the Education of Young Children website). Columns that may be of particular interest to early childhood education practitioners seeking strategies to prevent and address bullying or pre-bullying behavior in their classrooms include:
The last column, “Understand Bullying” (Gartrell and Gartrell, 2008), argues that addressing and preventing bullying or other mean/aggressive behaviors in the early childhood classroom should be proactive and comprehensive (rather than limited to addressing isolated incidences). Establishing a culture of respect in the classroom that recognizes and celebrates individual differences and commonalities is important for preventing and mitigating bullying, they note, as well as for addressing the underlying emotional causes behind acts of bullying in individual children. Gartrell and Gartrell (2008) also advise teachers to address incidents of bullying by helping the children involved find alternative resolutions to conflict that are more socially responsible, and to seek insight into the underlying causes behind the bullying that may be unrelated to the situation in which aggression was carried out.
Promoting kindness and compassion: In concert with research indicating the potentially negative
influence that media may have on the behavior of young children, of particular interest to the early
childhood community may be the work of The Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s
Media, at St. Vincent College (VanderVen, 2015). The Center’s website features a blog and several
publications discussing the developmentally appropriate uses of media in early childhood, with an
emphasis on using media to establish interpersonal connections. The mission of the Center and the
blog speaks to a broader emphasis on social and emotional development in young children, or, as they
note on their home page (www.fredrogerscenter.org) “to focus on helping children grow as confident,
competent, and caring human beings.”
The topic of engendering kindness and compassion in children has also gained traction in the early childhood field. The Making Caring Common Project at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education presents five strategies for raising “moral, caring children,” including prioritizing care for others and providing opportunities for children to practice these desired behaviors. Taken as a whole, there are a growing number of resources available through the mainstream media for parents, caregivers, and others interested in promoting and supporting the development of empathy and compassion in young children.
This section briefly describes five evidence-based early childhood programs that help address or prevent risk factors for bullying in young children (birth to age eight). Summaries of their evidence base are provided in the full report.ii
Al’s Pals: Kids Making Healthy Choices: Al’s Pals (see http://wingspanworks.com/healthy-al/) is a comprehensive curriculum and training program for teachers of children ages three to eight. Al’s Pals teaches children to express feelings appropriately, control impulses, show empathy, establish friendships, and solve problems peacefully. Al’s Pals helps children on the receiving end of bullying by giving them the skills to assert themselves, and encourages potential passive bystanders to care about the feelings of others and not tolerate hurtful behavior.
Incredible Years: The Incredible Years Series (see http://incredibleyears.com/) is a set of training programs designed for parents and teachers, and children ages birth to 12 years, to help children with ADHD or conduct/behavioral disorders.
Promoting Alternative THinking Strategies (PATHS) for Preschool: The PATHS curriculum (see http://www.pathseducation.com/what-is-paths/paths-curriculum) is a comprehensive, preventive program that
promotes emotional and social competencies, aimed at reducing aggression and behavior problems in children from preschool through elementary school, while also enhancing the educational process in the classroom. The PATHS Preschool/Kindergarten curriculum, designed for children three to six years of age, supports the development of self-control, positive self-esteem, emotional awareness, basic problemsolving skills, social skills, and friendships. The curriculum is designed for educators and counselors to be used over time in a multi-year, universal prevention model. PATHS is primarily focused on the school and classroom settings; however, information and activities are also provided for use with parents.
Raising Safe Kids: The Adults and Children Together Against Violence Raising Safe Kids (see http://actagainstviolence.apa.org/) program teaches positive parenting skills to parents and caregivers of children from birth to age eight. Raising Safe Kids is primarily designed for families at risk for child maltreatment, to promote positive parenting approaches for the success of the family and the longterm success of the child. The intervention focuses on positive parenting strategies also as a method for reducing children’s externalizing behaviors, such as aggression and bullying.
Second Step: Second Step (see http://www.cfchildren.org/second-step) is a universal classroom-based social-skills program for children ages four to 14. The program teaches socioemotional skills with the goal of reducing impulsive and aggressive behavior while increasing social competence. Children are taught to identify and manage their own emotions as well as to understand others’ emotions. Second Step guides children to reduce impulsiveness and emotion-driven decision making, while also teaching them to set positive goals. The Second Step model combines cognitive behavioral intervention models with social learning theory, empathy research, and social information-processing theories. The program is implemented through school curricula, parent training, and skill development.
This brief provides a short summary of risk factors in early childhood for later involvement in bullying, and then summarizes a variety of specific strategies, interventions, and guidance for addressing and preventing aggressive behavior in young children. There are a number of evidence-based approaches that have been found to be effective in addressing aggression in early childhood, as well as promising practices and strategies for teachers, parents, and other caregivers to promote prosocial, compassionate behavior in children. Ideas for classroom interventions and activities described above provide early childhood educators with strategies for age-appropriate activities designed to prevent exclusion and other “mean” behaviors. In addition, online resources from organizations such as the National Association for the Education of Young Children help translate research into practice tips, and put forth innovative strategies for problem solving with children.
Based on the robust support of the research for an association between a child’s relationship with his or her caretakers and subsequent or later “mean,” aggressive, or bullying behavior, interventions with young children, particularly in the context of early childhood education and care settings, should include a keen focus on improving, strengthening, or maintaining these essential relationships. It is our hope that this resource guide and the accompanying report may serve as a starting point for experts and practitioners in the field who are seeking to better understand the developmental trajectory of bullying and its root causes, and respond with effective and innovative approaches.
We’d love to hear your thoughts on this publication. Has it helped you or your organization? Email us at feedback@childtrends.
i Bullies in the Block Area: The Early Childhood Origins of “Mean” Behavior, www.childtrends.org
ii Bullies in the Block Area: The Early Childhood Origins of “Mean” Behavior, www.childtrends.org
Copyright 2015 by Child Trends, Inc.
Child Trends is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center that studies children at all stages of development. Our mission is to improve outcomes for children by providing research, data, and analysis to the people and institutions whose decisions and actions affect children. For additional information, including publications available to download, visit our website at childtrends.org.
Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D.S., Tremblay, R.E., Bates, J. E., Brame, B., Dodge, K. A., Ferguson, D., Horwood, J. L., et al. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a sixsite, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 222–245
Child Welfare Information Gateway (2009). Understanding the effects of maltreatment on brain development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Humans Services, Children’s Bureau.
Curtner-Smith, M.E. (2000). Mechanisms by which family processes contribute to school-age boy’s bullying. Child Study Journal, 30(3), 169-186.
Fraser, M., Lee, J., Kupper, L., & Day, S. (2010). A controlled trial of making choices: Six month follow-up. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(2), 165-176.
Friedrich, L. K., & Stein, A. H. (1973). Aggressive and prosocial television programs and the natural behavior or preschool children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (151), 1-63.
Gartrell, D. & Gartrell, J.J. (2008). Guidance Matters: Understand Bullying. Young Children, 63(3), 54-57. Available at: ; https://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200805/BTJ_Guidance_Bullying.pdf
Gladden, R.M., Vivolo-Kantor,A.M., Hamburger, M.E., Lumpkin, C.D. Bullying Surveillance Among Youths: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education; 2013.
Harrist, A. W. & Bradley, K.D. (2003). “You can’t say you can’t play”: intervening in the process of social exclusion in the kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18(2), 185-205.
Lamb, J., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. (2009). Approach to bullying and victimization. Canadian Family Physician, 55(4), 356-360.
Levin, D.E. (2013). Beyond Remote-Controlled Childhood: Teaching Young Children in the Media Age. National Association for the Education of Young Children. Washington, D.C.
Mares, M. & Woodard, E. (2005). Positive Effects of Television on Children’s Social Interactions: A Meta-Analysis. Media Psychology, 7(3), 301-322, DOI: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0703_4
Monks, C., Smith, P., & Swettenham, J. (2003). Aggressors, victims, and defenders in preschool: Peer, self-, and teacher reports. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 453–469.
Nagin, D., Tremblay, R.E. (1999). Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 70, 1181–1196.
Ostrov, J.M., Gentile, D.A., & Crick, N.R. (2006). Media exposure, aggression and prosocial behavior during early childhood: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 15(4), 612-627.
Paley, V. G. (1993). You Can’t Say You Can’t Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perren, S., & Alsaker, F. D. (2006). Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully–victims and bullies in kindergarten. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 47(1), 165–176.
Sprung, B., Froschl, M., & Hinitz, B. (2005). The Anti-Bullying and Teasing Book for Preschool Classrooms. Gryphon House.
Storey, K., & Slaby, R. (2013). Eyes on Bullying in Early Childhood. Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.eyesonbullying.org/pdfs/eob-early-childhood-508.pdf
Storey, K., & Slaby, R. (2013). Eyes on Bullying in Early Childhood. Education Development Center, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.eyesonbullying.org/pdfs/eob-early-childhood-508.pdf
Teisl, M. & Cicchetti, D. (2008). Physical abuse, cognitive and emotional processes, and aggressive/disruptive behavior problems. Social Development, 17(1), 1-23.
Tremblay, R, Nagin, D., Seguin, J., Zoccolillo, M., Zelazo, P., Boivin, M., Perusse, D., Japel, C. (2010). Physical aggression during early childhood. Pediatrics, 114(1), 43-50.
Troy, M. & Stroufe, L.A. (1987). Victimization among preschoolers: Role of attachment relationship history. Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 261, 66-172.
Vaillancourt, T., Miller, J.L., Fagbemi, J., Côté, S., & Tremblay, R.E. (2007). Trajectories and predictors of indirect aggression: Results from a Nationally Representative Longitudinal Study of Canadian Children Aged 2 -10. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 314-326.
Vandenberg, B. & Marsh, U. (2009). Aggression in youths: child abuse, gender, and SES. North American Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 437-441.
VanderVen, K. (2015). From the Bully Pulpit: ‘Relational Aggression’ or ‘Bullying’ in Preschool Children As Endemic Anxious Attachment [PowerPoint slides]. Presentation at “Early Childhood Roots of Bullying” Leadership Round Table. Child Trends, Bethesda, MD. June 1, 2015.
Vlachou, M., Andreou, E., Botsoglou, K., & Didaskalou, E. (2011). Bully/Victim Problems Among Preschool Children: a Review of Current Research Evidence. Educational Psychology Review. 23(3), 329-358.
Wilson, B. J. (2008). Media and Children’s Aggression, Fear, and Altruism. The Future of Children , 18(1), 87-118.
Zielinska, I. E., & Chambers, B. (1995). Using group viewing of television to teach preschool children social skills. Journal of Educational Television, 21, 85-99
Zimmerman, F.J., Glew, G.M., Christakis, D.A., & Katon, W. (2005). Early cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and television watching as predictors of subsequent bullying among grade-school children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 384-388.